Archive for the ‘Case-Shiller Index’ Category

Ignore The Case-Shiller Index; Focus On The Future Instead

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

Case-Shiller December 2010

Last week, Stan­dard & Poor’s released its Case-Shiller Index for Decem­ber 2010. The index is a home val­u­a­tion tracker, meant to meausure the change in home prices from one period to the next.

December’s Case-Shiller Index showed major deval­u­a­tions nation­wide. As com­pared to Decem­ber 2009, on a year-over-year basis, home val­ues fell in 18 of the Case Shiller Index’s 20 tracked mar­kets, and the U.S. National Index dropped 4 per­cent overall. 

The retreat puts December’s home val­ues at sim­i­lar lev­els as com­pared to early-2003.

That said, buy­ers and sell­ers would be wise to take the find­ings lightly. The Case-Shiller Index is inher­ently flawed. As such, its results are nei­ther prac­ti­cal — nor rel­e­vant — to every­day Americans.

There are 3 Case-Shiller flaws, in fact.

The first flaw is the index’s lim­ited sam­ple set. Wikipedia lists 3,100+ munic­i­pal­i­ties nation­wide and we can be cer­tain that real estate is bought and sold in all of them. The Case-Shiller Index, how­ever, mea­sures just 20 of them. That’s less than 1% of all U.S. cities. And then, within those tracked cities, Case-Shiller reports an aver­age, lump­ing dis­parate neigh­bor­hoods and streets into one big number.

The “national fig­ures” aren’t really national, and the “city data” doesn’t apply to your home, specifically.

The sec­ond Case-Shiller Index flaw is how it mea­sures home value changes. The index only con­sider at “repeat sales” of the same home, so long as that home is a single-family, detached prop­erty. Con­do­mini­ums, multi-family homes, and new con­struc­tion are ignored in the Case-Shiller Index.

Because dis­tressed prop­er­ties account for such a high per­cent­age of resales lately — 36% in Decem­ber –fore­clo­sures and short sales skew Case-Shiller Index worse.

And, lastly, the Case-Shiller Index is flawed by “age”. Because it reports closed sales a 60-day delay, December’s Case-Shiller Index is mea­sur­ing the val­ues of home sales con­tracts from Sep­tem­ber and Octo­ber. The Case-Shiller Index, there­fore, is a snap­shot of the not-so-recent past, and does lit­tle to tell us about the next 60 days.

Over­all, the Case-Shiller Index is help­ful tool for econ­o­mists and policy-makers, but it doesn’t do much good for indi­vid­ual home­own­ers. For accu­rate, real-time hous­ing data in your local mar­ket, talk to a real estate pro­fes­sional instead.

Why You Shouldn’t Put Too Much Faith In October’s Case-Shiller Index

Thursday, December 30th, 2010

Case-Shiller October 2010

The Case-Shiller Index posted awful num­bers in its most recent read­ing. Each of the index’s 20 tracked mar­kets showed home price dete­ri­o­ra­tion between September’s and October’s respec­tive report. Some mar­kets fell as much as 2.9 per­cent.

The drop in val­ues is noth­ing about which to panic, how­ever. The Case-Shiller Index is just re-reporting what we already knew. It’s a com­mon theme with the Case-Shiller Index, actu­ally; a trait traced to the report’s methodology.

The Case-Shiller Index is an imper­fect hous­ing indi­ca­tor with 3 inher­ent flaws.

The first flaw is that the index makes use of a lim­ited data set, tracking val­ues in just 20 cities nation­wide. That data set is then pro­jected across the more than 3,100 other munic­i­pal­i­ties in the United States. The “national fig­ures”, there­fore, aren’t really national.

The sec­ond flaw is that, even within the tracked 20 cities, not all home sales are included. The Case-Shiller Index only tracks sales of single-family, detached homes, and within that mar­ket sub­set, it only uses homes that are “repeat sales”. This specif­i­cally excludes sales of con­do­mini­ums and multi-family homes, and new construction.

Lastly, Case-Shiller Index’s third flaw is its “age”. The Case-Shiller Index reports on a 60-day delay, and the val­ues it reports are tied to con­tracts writ­ten even longer ago.  Sales con­tracts from July and August are respon­si­ble for October’s clos­ings so when we see the Case-Shiller Index as reported in Decem­ber, some of the data it’s report­ing is 5 months old already. That’s too old to be relevant.

Look­ing back at 2010, hous­ing was at its weak­est between May and August. There­fore, it’s no sur­prise that the most recent Case-Shiller Index shows sig­nif­i­cant weak­ness.  Look­ing for­ward, we should expect the report to improve — espe­cially because of how strong New Home Sales and Exist­ing Home Sales have been since summer.

The Case-Shiller Index is help­ful for econ­o­mists and policy-makers. It’s not much good for indi­vid­ual home­own­ers, how­ever. For accu­rate, real-time hous­ing data, talk to a real estate pro­fes­sional instead.

September’s Case-Shiller Index Reflects A Slowing Housing Market

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

Case-Shiller Change In Home Values September 2009-2010

Stan­dard & Poors released the Sep­tem­ber Case-Shiller Index Tues­day. The Case-Shiller Index is a home-value tracker. The report shows home prices down 0.7% from August and val­ues fad­ing, in general.

Case-Shiller rep­re­sen­ta­tives assessed the find­ings as “another weak report; weaker than last month”, cit­ing dete­ri­o­ra­tion in 18 of 20 tracked mar­kets. Upward pric­ing momen­tum from the sum­mer is slow­ing and val­ues remain 30% off the market’s June 2006 peak. It could spell bad news for home sell­ers this winter.

That said, the Case-Shiller Index is imper­fect; its method­ol­ogy flawed. The index is not meant for use by indi­vid­ual buy­ers or sell­ers — for 3 reasons.

First, the Case-Shiller Index reports on a 2-month delay. Today is Decem­ber 1 and we’re dis­cussing data from Sep­tem­ber. In the 8 weeks since, the econ­omy has shifted to a net jobs gainer, and the Fed­eral Reserve has com­mit­ted to $600 bil­lion in re-investment.  These are major devel­op­ments that weren’t a part of September’s hous­ing mar­ket, but are rel­e­vant today.

Espe­cially because employ­ment is largely believed to be a key­stone to housing.

    Sec­ond, the Case-Shiller sam­ple set is lim­ited to just 20 cities nation­wide. This means that most U.S. home sales are specif­i­cally not included in the Case-Shiller Index’s monthly findings.

    And that ties into rea­son num­ber three — all real estate is local. No mat­ter what the Case-Shiller Index says about the coun­try, what mat­ters to your local mar­ket is what’s hap­pen­ing in your local mar­ket. Each neigh­bor­hood has its own hous­ing econ­omy and that’s some­thing that can’t be cap­tured by a national report.