Posts Tagged ‘Case-Shiller Index,Home Values’

January 2011 Case-Shiller Index : Weak And Flawed

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

Case-Shiller Annual Change January 2011

Stan­dard & Poors released its Case-Shiller Index for the month of Jan­u­ary this week. The index is a home val­u­a­tion tool, mea­sur­ing the monthly and annual changes in home prices in select cities nationwide.

January’s Case-Shiller Index gave a poor show­ing. As com­pared to Decem­ber 2010, home val­ues dropped in 19 of the Case-Shiller Index’s 20 tracked mar­kets. Only Wash­ing­ton, D.C. gained. The results were only mod­estly bet­ter on an annual basis, too.

18 of 20 mar­kets wors­ened in the 12 months end­ing Jan­u­ary 2011.

Accord­ing to the report, val­ues are down 3.1% from last year, retreat­ing to the same lev­els from Sum­mer 2003. As a buyer or seller in today’s mar­ket, though, don’t read too much into it. The Case-Shiller Index is far too flawed to be the final word in housing.

The index has 3 main flaws, in fact.

The first flaw is the Case-Shiller Index’s lack of breadth. The report is posi­tioned as a national index, but its data is sourced from just 20 cities nationwide.

Putting that num­ber in per­spec­tive: the Case-Shiller Index tracks home val­ues from fewer than 1% of the 3,100 U.S. munic­i­pal­i­ties – yet still calls the report a “U.S. Average”.

A sec­ond flaw in the Case-Shiller Index is how it mea­sures home price changes, specif­i­cally. Because the index only con­sid­ers “repeat sales” of the same home in its cal­cu­la­tions, and only tracks single-family, detached prop­erty, it doesn’t cap­ture the “full” U.S. mar­ket. Con­do­mini­ums, multi-family homes, and new con­struc­tion are ignored in the Case-Shiller Index algorithm. 

In some regions, homes of these excluded types rep­re­sent a large per­cent­age of the market.

And, lastly, the Case-Shiller Index is flawed because of the amount of time required to release it.

Today, it’s almost April and we’re talk­ing about closed home resales from Jan­u­ary which is really com­prised of homes that went under con­tract in Octo­ber — close to 6 months ago. Sales prices from 6 months ago is of lit­tle value to today’s home buyer, of course.

The Case-Shiller Index can be a help­ful tool for econ­o­mists and policy-makers try­ing to make sense of the broader hous­ing mar­ket, but it tends to fail for indi­vid­u­als like you and me. When you want accu­rate, real-time hous­ing fig­ures for your local mar­ket, talk to your real estate pro­fes­sional instead.

Case-Shiller Shows Slowing Growth In Home Prices… Two Months Ago

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

Case-Shiller Change In Home Values June-July 2010

For the 17th straight month, the Case-Shiller Index reports that home val­ues are ris­ing across the United States. As com­pared to June, July’s prices were up by 4 percent.

How­ever, despite the improve­ment, July’s Case-Shiller Index showed weaker as com­pared to prior months.

  • In June, just 3 cities posted year-to-year reduc­tions in home value. In July, 10 of 20 did.
  • In June, just 1 city posted a month-to-month reduc­tion in home value. In July, 7 of 20 did.

As a spokesper­son for Case-Shiller said, val­ues “crept for­ward” in July. But not that it mat­ters — the Case-Shiller Index is a bet­ter tool for econ­o­mists than it is for home­own­ers. This is for 3 reasons.

First, the Case-Shiller Index is on a 60-day delay but real estate sales are based on prices today. A lot can change in 60 days, and it often does. There­fore, the Case-Shiller Index is a bet­ter snap­shot of the for­mer mar­ket than the cur­rent one.

Sec­ond, the Case-Shiller Index is geographically-limited. It tracks just 20 cities, ignor­ing some of the largest met­ro­pol­i­tan areas in the coun­try includ­ing Hous­ton, Philadel­phia, and San Jose. Smaller cities like Tampa are included.

And, lastly, national real estate data remains some­what use­less any­way. All real estate is local, ren­der­ing city­wide sta­tis­tics too broad to have any real mean­ing to an indi­vid­ual. To find out what’s hap­pen­ing on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood level, you can’t look to a national sur­vey — you have to look to a local real estate agent instead.

Case-Shiller Posts 16th Straight Month Of Home Price Improvement

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

Case-Shiller Change In Home Values May-June 2010

Accord­ing to the Stan­dard & Poors Case-Shiller Index, home val­ues rose 5 per­cent in June ver­sus the month prior, and 4 per­cent from a year ear­lier.  It’s the 16th con­sec­u­tive month in which Case-Shiller reported an increase in home val­ues and the third straight month of out­stand­ing results.

That said, home­own­ers and home buy­ers would do well to tem­per Case-Shiller enthu­si­asm. The June fig­ures are issued on 60-day delay and, over the last 60 days, hous­ing data has been lack­lus­ter at best.

Sto­ries like these high­light a key weak­ness of the Case-Shiller Index — it’s out of date as soon as it’s pub­lished. Because of this, the Case-Shiller Index rel­e­vance to every­day Amer­i­cans is muted. Peo­ple don’t buy homes in the “60 days ago” real estate mar­ket, after all.

June is ancient real estate history.

How­ever, the Case-Shiller Index does have its place. As the most widely-followed, private-sector hous­ing tracker, the index is used to help make pol­icy deci­sions and to shape Wall Street’s expec­ta­tions of the econ­omy. This means that a strong Case-Shiller read­ing can cause mort­gage rates to rise, and a weak Case-Shiller read­ing can cause rates to fall.

Tues­day, mort­gage rates fell.